The idea that deflation is not a problem and is actually what we need was peddled by a CNBC commentator, Peter Schiff, and I addressed it in an earlier post, but I had no idea the problem was so closely at hand. The argument went that because there was an asset price bubble being pricked, asset prices needed to come down and therefore deflation was a good thing. However, and I’m sure the commentator in question knows this, deflation refers to a falling price level across the basket of consumer goods included in the consumer price index. Deflation in this sense is devastating for the economy and particularly for debtors who see the real value of their debt increasing (of course CNBC commentators are not typically on the side of the debtors, but on the side of the monied interests who loaned the money). The graph below (which is from a post at Angry Bear) shows the compounded six month CPI growth rate and shows a significant deflationary environment when energy prices are included (they are typically excluded from short term numbers because of their high month-to-month volatility, but the data in this chart are multi-month and the volatility should be smoothed, so it is appropriate to include them).

This also I think shows the foolhardiness of calling the multi-month deflation influenced by falling oil prices an “energy tax cut” as Larry Kudlow does so often. He sees falling energy prices as a good thing and therefore, in his ideological mindset, it must therefore be a “tax cut”.